September 4

Activity Summary – Week Two

Made it to Friday of my first full week of work!  Yay me!   So what have I done this week?

I made it through the first pass of reviewing all 50 states (and DC) online codes. My goal was to have all of the state code data collection project done this week, so I’m pretty much on schedule. Yay me.*  About halfway through I decided I needed to have separate entries for the actual name of the code and the name of the official/certified version of the code.  (Because they’re not the same thing. Of course they’re not.)  I hope to fill that in, as well as a few unknowns in my datasheet by the end of business today.  That means I get to spend today in the Harvard Law Library Reading Room using the AALL State Bibliographies, which will hopefully help solve some mysteries for me.

After I get everything sorted I’ll make it all public.  I really want to jump into the data collection on case law, so any in depth analysis of the code information will probably wait.   I can say now that one way my thinking has changed is that – for some reason –  I used to think that only state websites could/should be the publisher of official digital copies of law.  However, something about seeing the number of privately published print official/certified codes has caused me to change my mind.  Why can’t a State Decoded website be certified too?

(I have vague ideas about how blockchain technology could be implemented ensure absolute accuracy and chain of custody with regards to code data without relying upon PDFs. But that’s another post for another day.  And I’m sure they’re are other ways of doing this. Hey hey, who’s got a research project and a couple of months to spare doing research?  This gal right here.  But I digress.)

Speaking of AALL, I was reminded this week of the Digital Access to Legal Information Committee.  They are the ones in charge of the 50 state surveys, which I am modelling my data collection on.  Yay for more people being interested in this type of information and future possible collaborators.

*It’s interesting being in charge of my own schedule and deadlines.  I like it.  Surprisingly, no guilt thus far about not working hard enough or fear about setting the bar too low.  I think maybe because it wasn’t that long ago that getting out of bed and getting dressed consisted of a victory for me that I’m in no rush to set myself up for failure.

Speaking of success, the Berkman stuff will finally start to ramp up next week.  There was an email chain of all the new/returning fellows/affiliates/associates etc introducing themselves.  Holy Impressive Lineup, Batman.  I was hit with a mixture of impostor syndrome and “I don’t think we’re in Kansas anymore, Toto.”  My parents like to kid me about being a librarian rockstar, but there are like, actual rockstars on this list.   And, oh, by the way, US Supreme Court justice coming to talk to us.   It’s intimidating and exciting and I can’t wait to learn more from the community.  I’m still not entirely sure how I am lucky enough to be doing this.

On the skills enhancement side of things, I started to work my way through the Code Academy web stuff.  All refresher thus far and pretty easy.    I was told by several people, quite understandably, that instead of asking what programming language I should learn, I should have a project in mind and build it and that will teach me what language to learn.  But that doesn’t quite answer the question about which language will do what I want – I don’t want to start building something in, say, Ruby, only to find that actually Python would have been better.  Does taht make sense?    At any rate, I think I’m going to start with the python modules on code academy.

I also want to highlight this blog post I read this week:  Libraries’ Tech Pipeline Problem.  Definitely reinforced my thinking that I have a great opportunity here to teach myself some new technical skills.

On a personal note, settling into Cambridge nicely.  My apartment – a small fully furnished one – is finally starting to feel a little like home/my space, even though I’m surrounded by other people’s stuff.  I’m also starting to get some routines in place, which are always comforting.   I’m definitely learning to embrace simplicity, just due to the size of my apartment and the fact that I couldn’t bring much stuff with me.  It’s nice.  I guess I could insert a reference to local boy Thoreau here, but I’ll pass on the temptation.    My plan for the weekend is to get the heck out of Boston one day – probably Salem because I know I definitely want to see that and soon it’ll be too close to Halloween to deal with – and maybe one day go down town and ride a double decker bus tour just to get the lay of the land.  I’ve been to Boston quite a few times in the past few years, but it seems like all I saw was either the convention center or Harvard Law School.

September 3

Utah Code Weirdness

This is NOT the only weird or confusing thing that I’ve encountered while surveying state codes online, but since I’m relying upon google webcaches (and my own saving of the webpages in question) to save this info, I thought I’d also blog some screenshots as a back up.

I’m currently looking at the Utah state codes.  I started, as I usually do, by googling “[state] code”.  The first hit, which is the government website, had in the synopsis part “The Utah Code consists of laws of the state that are codified. This web version is an official publication of the Utah State Legislature. Printed versions of the Utah …

I was pretty happy to see (a) an online official version and (b) the information so clearly spelled out without me having to hunt for it.  So I click on the link and

(You can click on the pictures to enlarge)

Okay, they moved.  No problem.  So I go to the new version and…there’s nothing about the officialness of the website.  Not at the bottom of the page, not in the Terms of Service, nada.   So what happened?  And when, exactly?

Here’s the before and after:

webcache

 

 

 

currentUtah

You’d think that something like ‘basic data collection about law’ wouldn’t have so many mysteries, but here we are.

Category: codes | LEAVE A COMMENT
September 1

Official vs. Authentic

First things first, Gentle Reader, let me manage your expectations and let you know that I do not plan on blogging every day.   It’s just that now, at the beginning of my experience when my mind is going in several different directions at once at 1000 miles per hour that I feel the need to write my thoughts down in an attempt to bring some order to the chaos.    ANYWAY.

I’m about 20% through my code data collection process and one surprise is the difficultly I am having getting confirmation of the “official state code.”   Sometimes it’s spelled out, like in Colorado or Delaware.  Sometimes you get a curveball, like the certified copies in Kentucky.  And sometimes, like in Arizona, you really have no indication on the government websites and you have to rely upon a library research guide to tell you the name/publisher of  the official version.  And I still can’t decide if the name of the Alabama code is “Code of Alabama” or “Code of Alabama 1975.”    I’m probably over thinking this, but I just really want some thing to tell me “This is the official code and this is it’s official name.”

I’m making note of the official version because often times (I’m assuming and will confirm when I get to the court data collection) that’s the version you have to cite to in court proceedings.  And it’s all well and good to put a version of the code online for free, but if you (or a library) still need to shell out several hundred dollars for the usuable version, well…fuck that. Not to put too fine a point on it.   I mean, is it just me?  I realize that I am a lawyer and a librarian therefore I am big on RULES.   I think if you’re going to make a RULE that someone needs to use certain product to be able to have full participation as a citizen in this country, especially when said product is full of edicts of government, well then by God it should be free to access.

Authentication is a whole other monster, one that I really wasn’t planning on getting into, except now I’ve found that at least California and Delaware are putting authenticated versions of their state codes online.  Basically, authentication means that you’re guaranteed that the version you are reading is as it was published by the government.   I find the idea of an authenticated version of law very appealing, but increasingly less necessary.  Mainly because we’ve gone 200+ years without authenticated versions of law and just because things are now born digital why bother completely changing things up?   Interestingly, of the two authenticated codes that I’ve found, California doesn’t have an official code and Delaware makes their online version official.  I’m wondering if any jurisdiction has competing official and authentic versions?  I guess I’ll find out.